Judy G. Russell, CG
"The Legal Genealogist"
Sat., 20 July 2013
Holy Cross College
NOTE! Discount will not show until the very last page before you pay!!!!
MGC Blog Latest Posts
RPAC Blog Feed
MGC Bulletin Signup
Get up to the minute news by subscribing to the MGC Bulletin
|Model Letter to Congressman|
|Written by Polly FitzGerald Kimmitt|
|Sunday, 18 December 2011 13:20|
[SUBSITUTE PROPER INFORMATION FOR YOUR OWN STATE AND LEGISLATOR]
Honorable Full Name
State of Massachusetts
Senator/Representative/Chair of XXX Committee
Massachusetts State House, Room XXX
Boston, MA 02133
Re: OPPOSE or SUPPORT Bill Number: AB XXX or SB XXX
Dear Sen./Rep./Chairman XXX:
I am a constituent, residing/working in city, state. [If you represent a genealogy society, give the name and number of members plus a very brief description.]
Since 1641 Massachusetts has had open access to records. We believe this bill to be in direction contravention to Massachusetts law (Massachusetts Public Records Access 950 CMR 32.00; GL c.66 §1, 2006 ed). While the proposed bill is a well-meaning effort to protect Massachusetts residents from identity theft, it has rarely been documented that an individual's identity is violated by access to vital records. Rather, the violations occur due to computer breaches from government and private enterprises.
Access to vital records is critical not only to hobbyist or tourist genealogists. Increasing numbers of physicians are requesting family medical histories which help save lives by tracing genetically inherited attributes and aid in locating potential blood, bone marrow and organ donors. These can only be done via access to vital records. The United States government hires genealogists to track down living family members of servicemen lost in previous conflicts, and without access to vital records this is much more time-consuming, if not impossible.
[Your additional thoughts…]
Thank you for your time and consideration on this matter. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.